A few of my blog posts have discussed the pitfalls of relying on universal legal forms like those provided through Legal Zoom.
the ABA Journal has posted what seems to be a legal victory for Legal Zoom – the South Carolina Supreme Court has declared that Legal Zoom’s document service is not the
“unauthorized practice of law” – for those of you non-lawyers reading this, in most states, you need to be licensed to practice law.
See the article here
I thought the following was particularly noteworthy:
of 20 practice areas encompassed by LegalZoom’s document service, for 19 of them the same basic services “are available online to South Carolina citizens (and the public at large) via other self-help portals at websites maintained by various South Carolina governmental agencies.”
It is not the provision of these forms that I find problematic, so much as the reliance of using these forms without legal advice. This is where the general population who use these forms can get into trouble.